Coleman v. McAleenan et al
| Nina Marie Coleman |
| Kevin McAleenan and Pete T Gaynor |
| 3:2019cv01619 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Nina Marie Coleman re: 11 Order on Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Agency FAD, #2 Exhibit(s) Individual Complaint 1 with remedial, #3 Exhibit(s) Individual Complaint 2 with remedial) (Coleman, Nina) |
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 first Motion to Extend Time to respond to the Court's Notice of Deficiency and Order. See Doc. #6 . Plaintiff's amended complaint in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) is now due by 8/30/2019. Plaintiff's failure to fully comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/29/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #6 Order And Notice of Deficiency, filed by Nina Marie Coleman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) CRCL/FINAL AGENCY DECISION, #2 Exhibit(s) AGENCY ADMITTING ERROR, #3 Exhibit(s) ATTY ADMITTING REPRISAL, #4 Exhibit(s) TRAVEL SPECIALIST TOLD ME TO CONTINUE TRAVELING, #5 Exhibit(s) SUPERVISOR APOLOGIZED ASSUMING TRAVEL WAS ONE DAY TRAVEL) (Coleman, Nina) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE by Nina Marie Coleman to #7 Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire. (Coleman, Nina) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Nina Marie Coleman (Coleman, Nina) |
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire sent to Nina Marie Coleman. Responses due by 8/9/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/11/2019) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 6
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Nina Marie Coleman must address the following deficiency: The complaint does not meet the basic pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 8/9/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/11/2019) (ndt)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nina Marie Coleman. (axm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nina Marie Coleman. (axm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Pete T Gaynor, Kevin McAleenan filed by Nina Marie Coleman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
