Davis v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc
| Latoya M Davis |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc |
| 3:2019cv01690 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MEDIATION ORDER. The parties are to select or designate a mediator. #Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary form provided electronically or by US Mail as appropriate. Deadline for mediation is on or before 8/17/2020. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 9/12/2019) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this court's four-week docket beginning 2/1/2021 before Judge Sam A. Lindsay. Joinder of Parties due by 3/30/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 3/30/2020. Motions due by 9/15/2020. Discovery due by 9/1/2020. Pretrial Order due by 1/4/2021. Pretrial Materials due by 1/4/2021. Status Report due by 12/10/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Sam A. Lindsay. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 9/12/2019) (ndt)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:13. Thu Sep 12 15:27:54 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Thu Sep 12 15:31:03 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Reilley, Steven) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The court orders Defendant to submit an explanation discussing why it is opposed to #9 MOTION to Dismiss no later than 9/13/2019. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 9/6/2019) (epm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Fri Sep 6 11:27:30 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Latoya M Davis re #9 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndt) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Latoya M Davis. (ndt) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND STATUS REPORT: Joint Status Report due by 9/9/2019. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 8/8/2019) (aaa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) NEF of 7 Thu Aug 8 12:22:05 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Aug 8 12:17:08 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion. Accordingly, Defendants may proceed without designating local counsel. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 8/7/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Pershing Square Holdings Ltd for Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Reilley, Steven) |
| Filing 5 MOTION For Leave To Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc (Reilley, Steven) |
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Reilley, Steven) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Reilley, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10116622) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Reilley, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | |
| Represented By: | Peter Thompson |
| Represented By: | Steven Scott Reilley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latoya M Davis | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
