Sisvel International SA et al v. ZTE (USA) Inc et al
Sisvel International S.A., 3G Licensing S.A., 3G Licensing SA and Sisvel International SA |
ZTE (USA) Inc and ZTE Corporation |
3:2019cv01694 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Property Rights: Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Neil A. Benchell. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/30/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Timothy Devlin. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/30/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to ZTE (USA) Inc. Waiver sent on 7/31/2019. (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10198693) filed by 3G Licensing SA, Sisvel International SA (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Sanding, #2 Proposed Order) (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10198645) filed by 3G Licensing SA, Sisvel International SA (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Devlin, Timothy) |
Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (rekc) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ZTE (USA) Inc, ZTE Corporation. (rekc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by 3G Licensing SA, Sisvel International SA identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Fineur International SA for Sisvel International SA. (Helms, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Sisvel International SA, 3G Licensing SA. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10117138) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) (Helms, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.