Brown v. Cavender et al
Tracy Brown |
Ashton Cavender and Averitt Express Inc |
3:2019cv01714 |
July 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Barbara M G Lynn |
Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Rule 26(A)(1) Disclosures filed by Averitt Express Inc (Gorbach, Lindsay) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for three-week docket beginning 10/19/2020 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. Joinder of Parties due by 5/4/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 5/4/2020. Motions due by 6/19/2020. Fact and Expert Discovery due by 8/17/2020. Settlement Status Report due by 5/4/2020. Pretrial Order due by 9/28/2020. Pretrial Materials due by 9/28/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 10/16/2020 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/5/2019) (axm) |
Filing 6 First Joint Submission on Discovery Matters by Tracy Brown. (Shaw, Phillip) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Averitt Express Inc. (Gorbach, Lindsay) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Averitt Express Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Gorbach, Lindsay) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Report due by 8/9/2019. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 7/19/2019) (mla) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 354th District Court, Hunt County, case number 87504 filed by Ashton Cavender. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10122437) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A- Index to State Court File, #4 Exhibit(s) A-1 - State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) A-2 - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #6 Exhibit(s) A-3 - LT req copy of POP, #7 Exhibit(s) A-4 - LT req citations, #8 Exhibit(s) A-5 - Citation to Cavender, #9 Exhibit(s) A-6 - Citation to Averitt, #10 Exhibit(s) A-7 - Aff of Return of Service on Averitt, #11 Exhibit(s) A-8 - LT req court's file, #12 Exhibit(s) A-9 - Costs Bill, #13 Exhibit(s) A-10 - Cavender's Original Answer, #14 Exhibit(s) Averitt's Consent to Removal) (Wright, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.