Davis v. City of Dawson Texas et al
| SAMUEL BERNARD DAVIS |
| CITY OF DAWSON, MICHAEL CARTER and City of Dawson Texas |
| 3:2019cv01751 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY filed by Michael Carter, City of Dawson Texas re: #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (White, Joshua) |
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion to File His Response to Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Out of Time. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/12/2019.)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time To File Response To Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss filed by Samuel Bernard Davis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Polk, James) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Samuel Bernard Davis re: #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Polk, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Defendants City of Dawson, Texas and Chief of Police Michael Carter's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. #8 ), filed August 20, 2019, is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge David L. Horan for hearing, if necessary, and for the United States Magistrate Judge to submit to the court proposed findings and recommendations for disposition of the motion. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/10/2019) (aaa)
|
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Michael Carter, City of Dawson Texas with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (White, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to City of Dawson Texas ; served on 8/6/2019. (Polk, James) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Michael Carter ; served on 8/2/2019. (Polk, James) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Samuel Bernard Davis. (Polk, James) |
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, by Plaintiff Samuel Bernard Davis. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Polk, James) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Michael Carter, City of Dawson Texas. (zkc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by SAMUEL BERNARD DAVIS. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10133553) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Polk, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
