Watson v. Randstad Technologies LLC
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Watson
Defendant: Randstad Technologies, LLC and Randstad Technologies LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv01767
Filed: July 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Motion for Protective Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 12/12/2019) (chmb)
December 11, 2019 Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Randstad Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Agreed Protective Order) (Manning, Stephanie)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER. The court appoints Arlene Steinfield as mediator. #Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary form provided electronically or by US Mail as appropriate. The clerk will send any requested documents to the mediator. Deadline for mediation is on or before 7/10/2020. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/23/2019) (aaa)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Trial set for 12/7/2020 before Judge Jane J. Boyle. Joinder of Parties due by 3/12/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 3/12/2020. Motions due by 9/8/2020. Discovery due by 8/9/2020. Deadline for mediation is on or before 7/10/2020. Pretrial Order due by 11/23/2020. Pretrial Materials due by 11/23/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 12/4/2020 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J. Boyle. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/23/2019) (rekc)
September 9, 2019 Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Mary Beth Watson. (Masterson, W)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 9/17/2019. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/27/2019) (zkc)
August 19, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mary Beth Watson. (Masterson, W)
July 30, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephanie Johnson Manning on behalf of Randstad Technologies LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Manning, Stephanie)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel. Because Defendant's attorney, Stephanie Johnson Manning, states that she is a member of the bar of this Court and maintains her residence in Frisco, Texas, which is within 50 miles of the Dallas Division Courthouse, she qualifies as local counsel under Local Civil Rule 83.10. However, Ms. Manning must make an appearance in this case, register on ECF, and be listed as defense counsel. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/26/2019) (chmb)
July 25, 2019 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
July 25, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Randstad Technologies, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shardonofsky, Esteban)
July 25, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Randstad Technologies, LLC. (Shardonofsky, Esteban)
July 25, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 191st, Dallas County, case number DC-19-08913 filed by Randstad Technologies, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10140266) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 Exhibit(s) B, #5 Exhibit(s) C, #6 Exhibit(s) D, #7 Exhibit(s) E, #8 Exhibit(s) F) (Shardonofsky, Esteban)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Randstad Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randstad Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Esteban Shardonofsky
Represented By: Stephanie Johnson Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randstad Technologies LLC
Represented By: Esteban Shardonofsky
Represented By: Stephanie Johnson Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Watson
Represented By: W D Masterson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?