Hanks v. Brinker International Inc et al
Katelyn Hanks |
Brinker International Inc, Beltline Airport Freeway Ltd and Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd |
3:2019cv01817 |
July 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Karen Gren Scholer |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bruce, Stacy) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Repond to the Complaint filed by Brinker International Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Uduebor Washington, Evbu) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Potential Unavailability filed by Katelyn Hanks (Schapiro, Douglas) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant Brinker Texas, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Brinker International Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)Attorney Evbu Cynthia Uduebor Washington added to party Brinker International Inc(pty:dft) (Uduebor Washington, Evbu) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Stacy Hoffman Bruce added to party Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd(pty:dft) (Bruce, Stacy) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Brinker International Inc ; served on 8/5/2019. (Schapiro, Douglas) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd; served on 8/1/2019. (Schapiro, Douglas) Modified to add party & date served on 8/8/2019 (zkc). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Striking DE 5 as incorrect filed by Katelyn Hanks (Schapiro, Douglas) |
Filing 5 ***DISREGARD PER #6 / REFILED AS DOCUMENT NO. #7 ***- SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Beltline/Airport Freeway, LTD.; served on 8/1/2019. (Schapiro, Douglas) Modified party served in text/and in background on 8/8/2019 (pnp). Modified on 8/8/2019 (zkc). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd, Brinker International Inc. (ndt) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Katelyn Hanks. (Schapiro, Douglas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beltline/Airport Freeway Ltd, Brinker International Inc filed by Katelyn Hanks. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10152012) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Schapiro, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.