Dukes v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Zseron Dukes |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 3:2019cv01849 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff Zseron Dukes must address the following deficiency: The complaint was not filed on the appropriate form and neither the $400 filing fee nor a request to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted. Therefore, by 9/3/2019, Plaintiff is ORDERED (1) to file his civil rights complaint on the enclosed form, and (2) to pay the $400 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the enclosed form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. See Complaint form at page 2, paragraph 3 for filing fee information under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b).The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to Plaintiff, with service of this Order, a prisoner civil rights complaint form and a prisoner form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/5/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID filed by Zseron Dukes. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mla) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Aug 2 15:37:05 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dukes v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Zseron Dukes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
