Lewis v. Saul
Darren Lamar Lewis |
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
3:2019cv01878 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David L Horan |
Sam A Lindsay |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed US Attorney; served on 9/3/2019. (sre) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew Saul ; served on 9/11/2019. (sre) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed US Attorney General; served on 9/13/2019. (sre) |
Filing 9 Business Reply Card signed by USMS re: #7 Order, #8 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #5 Consent Form. Signed on 8/13/2019. (zkc) |
Filing 8 Summons issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (zkc) |
Filing 7 ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT AND SPECIFYING FURTHER ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE CLERK granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal's Service shall serve process. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/12/2019) (zkc) Modified on 8/13/2019 (mcrd). |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Karl E. Osterhout has requested a waiver of the requirement to obtain local counsel. See Dkt. No. 4 (citing N.D. TEX. L. CIV. R. 83.10(a)). The request is GRANTED. Mr. Osterhout may represent Plaintiff in this case without obtaining local counsel but will be expected to abide by all local rules and court orders and personally appear, if ordered, at all court proceedings. And Plaintiff's counsel is advised that the Court will order that this appeal will be decided on appellate-type briefs, not cross-motions for summary judgment. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/12/2019.) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge David L. Horan. (epm) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Darren Lamar Lewis (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darren Lamar Lewis (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darren Lamar Lewis. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Darren Lamar Lewis. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Osterhout, Karl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.