Lockett et al v. The Finish Line Inc et al
Brandon Kibart and Rocelius Lockett |
Frisco Police Department, The Finish Line Inc. and The Finish Line Inc |
3:2019cv02113 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Eastern District of Texas Sherman Division as case number 4:19-cv-00750. (ndt) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #7 UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SHERMAN DIVISION. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/11/2019) (aaa) |
Interdistrict Transfer to the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. (aaa) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by The Finish Line Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Howard J Klatsky added to party The Finish Line Inc (pty:dft). (Klatsky, Howard) |
Filing 7 Agreed MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Brandon Kibart, Rocelius Lockett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Song, Tailim) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Jacob Davis on behalf of Frisco Police Department. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Davis, Robert) |
Filing 5 Notice of Agreement Regarding Deadline for Defendant The Finish Line Inc d/b/a Finish Line to File an Answer or Other Responsive Pleading in this Case by The Finish Line Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A) (Klatsky, Howard) Modified text on 9/27/2019 (rekc). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Frisco Police Department, The Finish Line Inc. (sre) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint by Plaintiffs Brandon Kibart, Rocelius Lockett. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Song, Tailim) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Rocelius Lockett, Brandon Kibart. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10242625) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Song, Tailim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.