Branch v. Receivables Performance Management LLC
| Tammy Branch |
| Receivables Performance Management LLC |
| 3:2019cv02133 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brantley Starr |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Tammy Branch (Agruss, Michael) |
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Agreed Motion to Extend Time for defendant to file response to complaint. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/21/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead as to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Tammy Branch (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Receivables Performance Management LLC ; served on 9/12/2019. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tammy Branch. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 9 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Receivables Performance Management LLC. (sre) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dena L Mathis for Michael S. Agruss on behalf of Tammy Branch. (Mathis, Dena) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by Tammy Branch. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Receivables Performance Management, LLC filed by Tammy Branch. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10250226) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Agruss, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Branch v. Receivables Performance Management LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Receivables Performance Management LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Branch | |
| Represented By: | Dena L Mathis |
| Represented By: | Michael S Agruss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
