Crenshaw v. City of Dallas
| Sandra Crenshaw |
| City of Dallas |
| 3:2019cv02214 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Sandra Crenshaw re: #9 Judge's Questionnaire. (axm) |
Filing 9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S QUESTIONNAIRE sent to Sandra Crenshaw. Deadline to respond to the questionnaire is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/20/2019) (aaa)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/20/2019) (aaa)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/20/2019) (aaa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8,9. Fri Sep 20 14:35:25 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue Sep 17 12:15:18 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sandra Crenshaw. (sre) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Sandra Crenshaw. (sre) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sandra Crenshaw. (sre) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against City of Dallas filed by Sandra Crenshaw. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crenshaw v. City of Dallas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Dallas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sandra Crenshaw | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
