Lifoam Industries LLC v. Plastilite Corporation
| Lifoam Industries LLC |
| Plastilite Corporation |
| 3:2019cv02223 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (sre) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lifoam Industries LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Lifoam Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Tallistar Corporation, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Polymer Process Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Zinc-Polymer Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Zinc-Polymer Parent Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Zinc-Polymer Investor Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate One Rock Capital Partners II, LP, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate One Rock Capital Partners, LLC for Lifoam Industries LLC. (Clayton, Jeffery) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Lifoam Industries, LLC filed by Lifoam Industries, LLC. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10270941) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Clayton, Jeffery) Modified payment information in docket text on 9/17/2019 (sre). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lifoam Industries LLC v. Plastilite Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Plastilite Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lifoam Industries LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeffery Josh Clayton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
