Titus v. Progressive Insurance Company County Mutual
Plaintiff: Pamela Titus
Defendant: Progressive Insurance Company County Mutual
Case Number: 3:2019cv02237
Filed: September 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9, 10. Wed Nov 13 10:19:22 CST 2019 (crt)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/12/2019) (mla)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING #8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's #4 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/12/2019) (mla)
October 21, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Oct 21 08:41:38 CDT 2019 (crt)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This action should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order and lack of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) (an involuntary dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits, unless otherwise specified). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 10/18/2019) (mcrd)
October 4, 2019 Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. 5 Order And Notice of Deficiency received back from Pamela Titus as not deliverable as addressed; unable to forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (axm)
October 1, 2019 Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #1 Judge Fish,, #2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Pamela Titus as Insufficient Address. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (sre)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Plaintiff Pamela Titus must address the following deficiency: The motion to proceed in forma pauperis does not provide enough information to determine whether Plaintiff should be granted in forma pauperis status. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to respond to the inquiries in the motion, leaving most answers blank. Further, a review of the docket reveals that Plaintiff has not yet registered as a user of the Court's electronic filing system, as required. Instructions for registering are found online at https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/AttorneyReg/. Therefore, by 10/15/2019, Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) fully respond to every inquiry in the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 Form and to resubmit it to the Court and (2) register to use the Court's electronic filing system. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). A motion to proceed in forma pauperis (AO 239 Form) is available online at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/AO239_0.pdf. No process will issue except upon order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/24/2019) (chmb)
September 18, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Sep 18 12:07:15 CDT 2019 (crt)
September 17, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pamela Titus. (sre)
September 17, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Progressive Insurance Company County Mutual filed by Pamela Titus. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre)
September 17, 2019 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre)
September 17, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Titus v. Progressive Insurance Company County Mutual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Titus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Insurance Company County Mutual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?