Mitchell v. Mitchell
Plaintiff: Dupree Armand Mitchell
Defendant: Shirely Mitchell, Bank One, Judges & Lawyers and Mr Trutit
Case Number: 3:2019cv02268
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE filed by Dupree Armand Mitchell. (axm)
October 3, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE filed by Dupree Armand Mitchell. (axm)
October 1, 2019 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mr Trutit, Judges & Lawyers, Bank One filed by Dupree Armand Mitchell, Mr Trutit, Judges & Lawyers, Bank One. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm)
September 30, 2019 Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Complaint by Plaintiff Dupree Armand Mitchell. (axm)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Plaintiff Dupree Armand Mitchell must address the following deficiency: The original complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis are not signed as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. In addition, the form-motion to proceed in forma pauperis is not fully completed. Further, a review of the docket reveals that Plaintiff has not yet registered as a user of the Court's electronic filing system, as required by Local Civil Rule. Instructions for registering as a pro se litigant may be found online at https:// ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/AttorneyReg. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to, by 10/16/2019: (1) file a signed complaint, (2) pay the $400.00 filing fee or file a completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO239 form, and (3) register to use the Court's electronic filing system or provide good cause why he cannot. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). Both a complaint form and a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis (AO239) are available online at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms. Any amended complaint will supersede (take the place of) Plaintiffs previous filing. Consequently, Plaintiff must state all claims and list all defendants in any amended complaint filed. No process will issue unless ordered by the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/25/2019) (chmb)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dupree Armand Mitchell. (sre)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dupree Armand Mitchell. (sre)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Shirely Mitchell filed by Dupree Armand Mitchell. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirely Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank One
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judges & Lawyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr Trutit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dupree Armand Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?