Feimster v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
Thomas Feimster and Thomas D. Feimster |
Bank of America NA and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
3:2019cv02373 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Real Property: All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice by Bank of America NA, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 8 56-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: On 10/25/2019, the parties filed a notice of settlement with this Court stating they have reached a settlement and that the settlement agreement contemplates the filing of dismissal documents within sixty (60) days. Given these representations, the Court dismisses all claims by all parties WITHOUT PREJUDICE subject to the parties' right to reopen within fifty-six (56) days if the settlement is not consummated. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/29/2019) (twd) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Bank of America NA, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/18/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bank of America NA with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Notice Concerning Extensions of Credit, #2 Exhibit(s) B-HUD-1, #3 Exhibit(s) C-Acknowledgement of Receipt of Loan Application and Final Itemized Disclosure, #4 Exhibit(s) D-Receipt of Document Copies, #5 Exhibit(s) E-Texas Home Equity Affidavit and Agreement, #6 Proposed Order) (Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Kathryn B Davis added to party Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft) (Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Bank of America Corporation for Bank of America, N.A.. (Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-19-13025 filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10319317) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-State Court File, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Davis, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.