Wallace v. United States of America
| David Ray Wallace |
| United States of America |
| 3:2019cv02387 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Oct 22 15:27:15 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 5
Order: The clerk's office is directed to close civil case number 3:19-CV-2387-G (BT), styled David Ray Wallace v. United States of America, and docket a copy of this order in that civil case. The clerk's office is further directed to docket defendant's pro se letter in this criminal case. The court will address defendant's letter by separate order. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/21/2019) (ykp)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: David Ray Wallace must address the following deficiency: A filing fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/16/2019) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Motion for IFP) (aaa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Oct 16 14:06:26 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Oct 9 08:32:42 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David Ray Wallace. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wallace v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Ray Wallace | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
