Cooper v. Isotex Health LLC et al
Joseph M Cooper |
Isotex Health, LLC, SMGB, LLC, Jason Cross, Eugene Elfrank, Greg Walker, GardnerBarnes, LLC, GardnerBarnes LLC, Isotex Health LLC, SMGB LLC and Jason B Cross |
3:2019cv02422 |
October 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Ed Kinkeade |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Because the Court cannot preside over a case where it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, Cooper's Motion for Remand is GRANTED under 1447(c). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/6/2019) (aaa) |
Filing 11 OBJECTION filed by Joseph M Cooper re: #10 MOTION for Hearing re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Ackels, Gregory) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Hearing re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Isotex Health LLC (Correa, Andres) |
Filing 9 REPLY filed by Joseph M Cooper re: #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Ackels, Gregory) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Isotex Health LLC re: #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Correa, Andres) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER EXPEDITING RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINE re: #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court . Responses due by 10/29/2019. Replies due by 11/5/2019. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/22/2019) (chmb) |
Judge Ed Kinkeade added pursuant to Special Order 3-334. There is a request for temporary restraining order within the Notice of Removal. Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater no longer assigned to case. (ewd) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Joseph M Cooper with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order, #2 Proposed Order Order) (Ackels, Gregory) |
Filing 5 **DISREGARD -REFILED AS #6 ** MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Joseph M Cooper with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order, #2 Proposed Order Order) (Ackels, Gregory) Modified on 10/18/2019 (dsr). |
Filing 3 Appendix in Support filed by Isotex Health, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, (Brassfield, Gregory) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jason Cross, Eugene Elfrank, GardnerBarnes, LLC, Isotex Health, LLC, SMGB, LLC, Greg Walker. (Brassfield, Gregory) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, case number dc-19-14479 filed by Isotex Health, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10334877) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Brassfield, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.