Coleman v. Couture Hotel Corporation et al
Jonathan Coleman and Antoinne Jimmerson |
Wyndham Franchisor, LLC, Couture Hotel Corporation and Wyndham Franchisor LLC |
3:2019cv02622 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Couture Hotel Corporation. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Strother, Justin) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Couture Hotel Corporation. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Justin Brett Strother added to party Couture Hotel Corporation(pty:dft) (Strother, Justin) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Wyndham Franchisor LLC re: #9 MOTION to Remand , #7 MOTION to Remand (Gober, Greg) |
Filing 13 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:19-CV-2623 consolidated with lead case 3:19-CV-2622. Antoinne Jimmerson added to case pursuant to consolidation. Attorney David W Crowe,John W Arnold,Cameron Earl Dean for Antoinne Jimmerson added to case pursuant to consolidation. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 12/18/2019) (svc) |
Filing 12 ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND STATUS REPORT: Status Report due by 1/8/2020. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 12/9/2019) (svc) |
Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by Jonathan Coleman re #10 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #9 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s)) (Arnold, John) |
Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jonathan Coleman re #9 MOTION to Remand (Arnold, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand filed by Jonathan Coleman with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Arnold, John) |
Filing 8 ***DISREGARD, REFER TO #10 FOR CORRECT FILING*** Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jonathan Coleman re #7 MOTION to Remand. (Arnold, John) Modified on 12/4/2019 (mla). |
Filing 7 ***DISREGARD, REFER TO #9 FOR CORRECT FILING*** MOTION to Remand filed by Jonathan Coleman with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Arnold, John) Modified on 12/4/2019 (mla). |
Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Wyndham Franchisor LLC. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,. with Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s), #9 Exhibit(s), #10 Exhibit(s), #11 Exhibit(s), #12 Exhibit(s), #13 Exhibit(s), #14 Exhibit(s), #15 Exhibit(s), #16 Exhibit(s), #17 Exhibit(s), #18 Exhibit(s), #19 Exhibit(s), #20 Exhibit(s), #21 Exhibit(s)) (Blaies, Grant) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The jurisdictional allegations in the Notice of Removal are insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity. Couture shall, therefore, file an amended notice of removal that cures the deficiency noted by 11/19/2019. Failure to do so will result in the sua sponte remand of this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 11/5/2019) (axm) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wyndham Franchisor LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc for Wyndham Franchisor LLC. (Blaies, Gregory) Modified text on 11/5/2019 (mla). |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Wyndham Franchisor LLC. (Blaies, Gregory) Modified title on 11/5/2019 (mla). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, case number DC-19-13552 filed by Wyndham Franchisor, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10383613) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s), #9 Exhibit(s), #10 Exhibit(s), #11 Exhibit(s), #12 Exhibit(s), #13 Exhibit(s), #14 Exhibit(s), #15 Exhibit(s), #16 Exhibit(s), #17 Exhibit(s), #18 Exhibit(s), #19 Exhibit(s), #20 Exhibit(s), #21 Exhibit(s)) (Blaies, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.