Bingham v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 3:2019cv02716 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr re: 9 Order And Notice of Deficiency (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. NEF of document 9 Wed Dec 4 13:12:15 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Doc. #8 , reflects deposits of $545.00 in Petitioner's inmate trust account during the past six months, including $300 deposited in the last three months. Since Petitioner's inmate trust account has a current balance of only $0.19, it appears that Petitioner may have deliberately attempted to drain his inmate trust account to avoid paying the $5.00 filing fee in this case. Consequently, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. See Miscellaneous Order No. 6, filed on May 5, 2005 (providing that a person seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and 2554 may proceed in forma pauperis if the average six month balance of the persons inmate trust account and other financial resources are less than $50.00). Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee by January 8, 2020. PETITIONER'S FAILURE TO PAY THE $5.00 FILING FEE MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THE DISMISSAL OF THE PETITION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/3/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr re: 6 Order And Notice of Deficiency. (Remailed consent form and notice of instruction of pro se party in case 3:19-cv-2726) (axm) Modified linkage on 12/5/2019 (axm). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. NEF of 7 Mon Nov 25 09:22:22 CST 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File a Single Copy of the Memorandum in Support of Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. Doc. #5 . (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/22/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr. (axm) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Petitioner Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr., must address the following deficiency: Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account by December 17, 2019. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). Forms necessary to comply with this order are available in the law library of the prison unit in which Petitioner is confined. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/18/2019) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Nov 18 15:23:02 CST 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Nov 15 10:43:05 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File A Single Copy filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr. (cdt) |
| Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (cdt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cdt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cdt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bingham v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bruce Edward Bingham, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
