Jubril v. DHS-ICE
Petitioner: Jeffery Wahab Jubril
Respondent: DHS-ICE
Case Number: 3:2019cv02726
Filed: November 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. remailed (see docket entry 10 in case 3:19-cv-2716) Thu Dec 5 09:28:05 CST 2019 (crt)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order to Show Cause. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ for DHS-ICE added. Deadline to reply to the answer is 60 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/20/2019) (axm)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/20/2019) (axm)
November 20, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Wed Nov 20 14:42:20 CST 2019 (crt)
November 18, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Nov 18 15:47:47 CST 2019 (crt)
November 15, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffery Wahab Jubril. (cdt)
November 15, 2019 Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jeffery Wahab Jubril re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (cdt)
November 15, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffery Wahab Jubril. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cdt) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/18/2019) (cdt).
November 15, 2019 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cdt)
November 15, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cdt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jubril v. DHS-ICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DHS-ICE
Represented By: Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffery Wahab Jubril
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?