MNK Infotech Inc v. Koumans
| MNK Infotech Inc |
| Mark Koumans |
| 3:2019cv02803 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by MNK Infotech Inc. (Banias, Brad) |
| Civil Case Terminated per #16 Stipulation of Dismissal. (mla) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #10 MOTION for Injunction filed by Mark Koumans with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Padis, George) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by George M Padis on behalf of Mark Koumans. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Padis, George) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Mark Koumans ; served on 12/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Proof of service) (Banias, Brad) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Alexander Gitlin on behalf of MNK Infotech Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Gitlin, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by MNK Infotech Inc re #10 MOTION for Injunction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Master's Degree, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Denial) (Banias, Brad) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Injunction filed by MNK Infotech Inc (Banias, Brad) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of filing proof of admission to the Bar of this Court re: 7 Order,, filed by MNK Infotech Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - proof of Admission) (Banias, Brad) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mark Koumans filed by MNK Infotech Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Banias, Bradley) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The parties are advised that unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. See Local Rule 83.9. One or more parties in this case has not complied with Local Rule 83.9. The parties have twenty days from this date to comply if they have not already done so. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov/forms/civil. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 11/26/2019) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 6
Electronic Order: Unless exempted, Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in or maintain their principal office in this district. To date, one or more of the parties has failed to comply with Local Rule 83.10 or file a motion for leave to appear without local counsel. The parties have twenty days from this date to comply if they have not already done so. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 11/26/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (cdt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mark Koumans. (cdt) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cdt) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MNK Infotech Inc. (Banias, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Koumans filed by MNK Infotech Inc. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10435364) Clerk to issue summons(es) for federal defendant(s). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Banias, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MNK Infotech Inc v. Koumans | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MNK Infotech Inc | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Banias |
| Represented By: | Brad Banias |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Alexander Gitlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mark Koumans | |
| Represented By: | George M Padis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
