Devabhaktuni v. Martin et al
| Manogna Devabhaktuni |
| Medical City of Green Oaks, Denton County Courts, Dasha Barton, Fio Johnson, David C Godbey, David Johnson, Joe A Fish, Talley R Parker, Hisham A Masri, William Pearce, NFN Rutherford, DFPS, Prim Rose at Lake Hill, CPS, Chilia Martin, Jamie Griffin and Dallas County Courts |
| 3:2019cv02846 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice based on the prior sanction order in Manogna Devabhaktuni v. Honorable David C. Godbey, No. 3:19-CV-2216-G (BT) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019). The plaintiff may not re-file this action or any other civil action in this court without prepaying the requisite filing fees. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 1/3/2020) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Sanction Order) (ctf)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ACCEPTING #5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed 11/27/2019 (docket entry #3 ), is DENIED. By separate judgment, this action will be summarily dismissed based on the prior sanction order in Manogna Devabhaktuni v. Honorable David C. Godbey, No. 3:19-CV-2216-G (BT) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 1/3/2020) (ctf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8. Fri Jan 3 13:54:51 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION/OBJECTION to #5 Findings and Recommendations by Manogna Devabhaktuni. (axm) |
|
Filing 5
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's #3 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the application should be denied, and the case should be summarily DISMISSED without prejudice unless the plaintiff timely pays the filing fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/5/2019) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Manogna Devabhaktuni. (cdt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Manogna Devabhaktuni. (cdt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Dasha Barton, CPS, DFPS, Dallas County Courts, Denton County Courts, Joe A Fish, David C Godbey, Jamie Griffin, David Johnson, Fio Johnson, Chilia Martin, Hisham A Masri, Medical City of Green Oaks, Talley R Parker, William Pearce, Prim Rose at Lake Hill, NFN Rutherford filed by Manogna Devabhaktuni. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cdt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (cdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
