F. M. v. Best Western International Inc et al
| F. M. |
| Red Lion Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Best Western International, Inc. and Best Western International Inc |
| 3:2019cv02901 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 , #12 , #13 , #14 Applications for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/29/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hyatt Hotels Corporation identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Hyatt Hotels Corporation for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. (Mosman, Valerie) |
| Filing 14 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10565002) filed by F. M. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cooper, Monica) |
| Filing 13 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Zachary A. Miller (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10563154) filed by Hyatt Hotels Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, #2 Exhibit(s) CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING, #3 Exhibit(s) ECF REGISTRATION) (Mosman, Valerie) |
| Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Robert E. Scott, Jr. (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10563093) filed by Hyatt Hotels Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, #2 Exhibit(s) CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING, #3 Exhibit(s) ECF REGISTRATION) (Mosman, Valerie) |
| Filing 11 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10563009) filed by Hyatt Hotels Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, #2 Exhibit(s) CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING, #3 Exhibit(s) ECF REGISTRATION) (Mosman, Valerie) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. It is ORDERED that Defendant Hyatt shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Motion for Protective Order by 2/26/2020. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/21/2020) (aaa)
|
| Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order filed by Hyatt Hotels Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Valerie Anderson Mosman added to party Hyatt Hotels Corporation(pty:dft) (Mosman, Valerie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charla G Aldous on behalf of F. M.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Aldous, Charla) |
| Filing 7 Court Request for Recusal: Judge Karen Gren Scholer recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:19-cv-2901-M. (ctf) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Best Western International Inc, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Red Lion Hotels Corporation. (ndt) |
|
Filing 4
Electronic Order: Unless exempted, Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in or maintain their principal office in this district. To date, one or more of the parties has failed to comply with Local Rule 83.10 or file a motion for leave to appear without local counsel. The parties have twenty days from this date to comply if they have not already done so. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 12/10/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Protective Order and Leave to Proceed Anonymously filed by F. M. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Proposed Order) (Lanier, W) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by F. M.. (Lanier, W) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Best Western International, Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Red Lion Hotels Corporation filed by F. M.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10465930) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet) (Lanier, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
