Hanks v. M Caceres Enterprises Inc et al
Plaintiff: Katelyn Hanks
Defendant: Zimmermann Enterprises LLC and M Caceres Enterprises Inc
Case Number: 3:2019cv02991
Filed: December 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Referring Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2020 Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Katelyn Hanks re: #12 Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Katelyn Hanks, #2 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Douglas Schapiro, #3 Exhibit(s) RICO Lawsuit Docket Report, #4 Exhibit(s) TRO Hearing Transcript, #5 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Tommy Vuong) (Schapiro, Douglas)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/10/2020) (chmb)
February 7, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to this Court's Order D.E. 12 filed by Katelyn Hanks (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Schapiro, Douglas)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The Court is requiring plaintiff Katelyn Hanks and counsel Schapiro to file affidavits. Hanks and Schapiro must file their affidavits within 7 days of the issuance of this order. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/4/2020) (ctf)
January 31, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Standing Documents filed by Katelyn Hanks (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Schapiro, Douglas)
January 28, 2020 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Brantley Starr: Status Conference held on 1/28/2020. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Douglas Schapiro, Emil Lippe; Defense - N/A. (Court Reporter: Kelli Ann Willis) (No exhibits) Time in Court - :02. (chmb)
January 23, 2020 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC Notice of Hearing: Status Conference set for 1/28/2020 at 10:00 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 1525, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, TX 75242-1310 before Judge Brantley Starr. Mr. Schapiro you are hereby ordered to appear for this hearing. (chmb) Modified on 1/23/2020 (chmb).
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. The above numbered case is hereby transferred to the docket of the Honorable Brantley Starr, and shall henceforth carry the suffix letter "X". Judge Karen Gren Scholer no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 1/23/2020) (ykp)
January 8, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to M Caceres Enterprises Inc; served on 12/30/2019. (Schapiro, Douglas)
January 7, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Zimmermann Enterprises LLC; served on 1/3/2020. (Schapiro, Douglas)
December 23, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to M Caceres Enterprises Inc, Zimmermann Enterprises LLC. (cdt)
December 19, 2019 Filing 4 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR***Disregard...Summons Issued as to M Caceres Enterprises Inc, Zimmermann Enterprises LLC. (cdt) Modified text on 12/23/2019 (svc).
December 19, 2019 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cdt)
December 19, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Katelyn Hanks. (Schapiro, Douglas)
December 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Caceres Enterprises, Inc., Zimmerman Enterprises, LLC filed by Katelyn Hanks. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10490484) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Schapiro, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanks v. M Caceres Enterprises Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zimmermann Enterprises LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Caceres Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katelyn Hanks
Represented By: Douglas S Schapiro
Represented By: Emil Lippe, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?