Chase v. Williams et al
| Pearline Chase |
| John B Williams, III and JBW Enterprises |
| 3:2019cv03012 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| David L Horan |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: The Court has entered its Order Accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/30/2020) (aaa)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ACCEPTING #8 THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #3 Complaint filed by Pearline Chase. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/30/2020) (aaa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9,10. Thu Jan 30 17:02:13 CST 2020 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Jan 9 10:02:41 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss this action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/8/2020) (ndt)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Pearline Chase re: #6 Order. (axm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. remailed new order (plaintiff's name corrected on last page) Mon Dec 30 11:08:21 CST 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Dec 26 09:17:04 CST 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: The Court ORDERS Chase to file no later than 1/23/2020 a written response to this order to show the Court that it has subject matter jurisdiction over this lawsuit. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/23/2019) (axm) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/30/2019) (mcrd).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Dec 20 11:18:06 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pearline Chase. (hml) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pearline Chase (hml) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against JBW Enterprises, John B Williams, III filed by Pearline Chase. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (hml) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (hml) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
