Sandeep v. Albence et al
| Singh Sandeep |
| William P Barr, Chad Wolf, Matthew T Albence and James Johnson |
| 3:2020cv00464 |
| February 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Cristina P Carrier (Clerk Note: Filer states no fee is to be collected due to prior payment or waiver by MO 16 or prior order.) filed by Singh Sandeep. (hml) |
| Filing 2 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Singh Sandeep. (Filing fee $400; receipt number DS122504) (hml) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1. Mon Feb 24 14:56:31 CST 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
