Ruben v. Bell & Williams Associates Inc et al
| Sametrius Ruben |
| Bell & Williams Associates, Inc., Suntrust Bank, Unlimited Asset Adjusters, LLC, Unlimited Asset Adjusters LLC and Bell & Williams Associates Inc |
| 3:2020cv00511 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Sametrius Ruben re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Unlimited Asset Adjusters LLC ; served on 3/16/2020. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Bell & Williams Associates Inc ; served on 3/16/2020. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David C Miller on behalf of Suntrust Bank. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Miller, David) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Suntrust Bank identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Truist Financial Corporation for Suntrust Bank. (Smith, S) |
| Filing 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Suntrust Bank re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6). (Smith, S) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) filed by Suntrust Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney S David Smith added to party Suntrust Bank (pty:dft). (Smith, S) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Suntrust Bank; served on 3/16/2020. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Sametrius Ruben (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bell & Williams Associates Inc, Suntrust Bank, Unlimited Asset Adjusters LLC. (hml) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sametrius Ruben. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Bell & Williams Associates, Inc., Suntrust Bank, Unlimited Asset Adjusters, LLC filed by Sametrius Ruben. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10660457) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Contract, #2 Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
