Tekgigz LLC et al v. Wolf et al
| Tekgigz LLC and Advanced Resource Staffing Inc |
| Chad F Wolf, Department of Homeland Security and US Department of Homeland Security |
| 3:2020cv00525 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brantley Starr |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER: The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the plaintiffs complaint, grants the plaintiffs leave to replead within 28 days, and DISMISSES AS MOOT the plaintiffs motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/13/2020) (svc)
|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Brantley Starr: TRO/Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 3/13/2020. Court to take matter under advisement. Courts adjourned. Attorney admission - NDTX Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Sharadah Sankararaman, Rajaguru Nalliah; Defense - Joshua Press. (Court Reporter: Tutti Bui) (No exhibits) Time in Court - 1:12. (chmb) |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC Notice of Hearing. Motion Hearing set for 3/13/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Brantley Starr re: plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order #2 , and motion for preliminary injunction #3 . (chmb) |
| Filing 12 REPLY filed by Advanced Resource Staffing Inc, Tekgigz LLC re: #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by US Department of Homeland Security, Chad F Wolf re: #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joshua Samuel Press on behalf of US Department of Homeland Security, Chad F Wolf. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Advanced Resource Staffing Inc, Tekgigz LLC (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
| ***Please Disregard filed in wrong case*** Civil Case Terminated per 33 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. (ndt) Modified on 3/3/2020 (ndt). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs' #1 Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and #2 Application for Temporary Restraining Order and #3 Preliminary Injunction/Stay of Administrative Proceedings. Plaintiffs seek a restraining order before 4/1/2020. To enable the Court to adequately consider any argument the Government has before this date, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to provide to the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, Erin Nealy Cox, and the Chief of the Civil Division for the Northern District of Texas, Scott Hogan, a copy of its Complaint and this Order no later than 1:00 p.m. on 3/3/2020. Should the United States of America wish to contest Plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order, it must submit a responsive brief no later than 3/9/2020. Plaintiffs may file a reply brief to any response no later than 4:00 p.m. on 3/10/2020. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/2/2020) (axm)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Rajaguru N Nalliah. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/2/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Rajaguru Nalliah (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10666500) filed by Advanced Resource Staffing Inc, Tekgigz LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order proposed order) (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to US Department of Homeland Security, Chad F Wolf, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (axm) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Advanced Resource Staffing Inc, Tekgigz LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order, #3 Service) (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Advanced Resource Staffing Inc, Tekgigz LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tekgigz LLC, Advanced Resource Staffing Inc. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10664216) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits 1,2,3, #2 Service) (Sankararaman, Sharadha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
