Martin v. Capital One Financial Corp
Roy Martin |
Capital One Financial Corp |
3:2020cv00662 |
March 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jane J Boyle |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Capital One Financial Corp re: #11 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Jacobsen, Allison) |
Filing 14 REPLY filed by Capital One Financial Corp re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Jacobsen, Allison) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Conference re 12 Order, by Lorenzo Brown on behalf of Roy Martin (Brown, Lorenzo) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff has filed #11 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, but Plaintiff's motion lacks a Certificate of Conference, as required under Local Rule 7.1(b). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to submit a notice with the Court on or before April 28, 2020, that indicates whether Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is opposed or unopposed by Defendant. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/24/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Roy Martin with Brief/Memorandum in Support.. Party Lesyle Manuel added. (Brown, Lorenzo) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Roy Martin re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Brown, Lorenzo) |
Filing 9 ORDER: The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs #6 amended complaint from the record. Moreover, to ensure the expedient resolution of Plaintiffs claims, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff file a response to Defendants pending #4 motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint on or before Tuesday, 4/28/2020. Further, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file any motion for leave to amend his complaint on or before Thursday, 4/30/2020, so that the Court can address this matter before ruling on the pending motion to dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/23/2020) (svc) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Roy Martin re: #5 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, (Brown, Lorenzo) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Roy Martin. (Brown, Lorenzo) |
Filing 6 ***STRICKEN PER #9 ORDER*** AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Roy Martin. Summons(es) not requested at this time. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Brown, Lorenzo) Modified text on 4/23/2020 (svc). |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: By Friday, April 24, 2020, at 12:00 p.m., Plaintiff must SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why he has not yet responded to Capital Ones #4 motion to dismiss. Failure to show cause or file the appropriate documents may result in dismissal of Plaintiffs action without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/20/2020) (svc) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Capital One Financial Corp with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacobsen, Allison) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Capital One Financial Corp d/b/a Capital One. (Jacobsen, Allison) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 44th Judicial District, Dallas County, case number DC-20-02703 filed by Capital One Financial Corp d/b/a Capital One. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10709251) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Jacobsen, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martin v. Capital One Financial Corp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corp | |
Represented By: | Allison F Jacobsen |
Represented By: | Tara Leigh Elgie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roy Martin | |
Represented By: | Veretta L Frazier |
Represented By: | Lorenzo Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.