Kaneka Corporation v. I&I Hair Corporation et al
| Kaneka Corporation |
| I&I Hair Corporation and Juanika Nicole Hunlen |
| 3:2020cv00722 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Assault, Libel & Slander |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), FED. R. CIV. P. re 6 Order on Motion to Stay, 8 Order on Motion to Stay, by Kaneka Corporation. (Bowick, Robert) |
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Continued Stay. The Court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint stipulation of dismissal or agreed final judgment on or before June 1, 2020. If the parties cannot agree to settlement terms on or before June 1, 2020, the Court ORDERS the defendant to instead answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's complaint on or before June 1, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/12/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Motion for Continued Stay filed by Kaneka Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bowick, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Plaintiff Kaneka Corporation's Unopposed Motion for a Brief Stay Pending Finalization of a Settlement Agreement. Since the parties have settled this case, the Court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint stipulation of dismissal or agreed final judgment no later than May 11, 2020. All other deadlines in this case are stayed. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/20/2020) (chmb)
|
| Civil Case Terminated per 6 Electronic Order. (ykp) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay PENDING FINALIZATION OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT filed by Kaneka Corporation (Bowick, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Juanika Nicole Hunlen, I&I Hair Corporation. (hml) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kaneka Corporation. (Bowick, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Juanika Nicole Hunlen, I&I Hair Corporation filed by Kaneka Corporation. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10726236) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Bowick, Robert) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Mar 25 16:33:22 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
