Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Carolyn Ann Stephens |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
| 3:2020cv00823 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General; Served on 4/22/2020. (oyh) Modified Docket Text on 5/28/2020 (oyh). |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney; Served on 5/4/2020. (oyh) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security; served on 4/21/2020. (oyh) |
| Filing 10 Business Reply Card signed by USMS; re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed on 4/9/2020. (ndt) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting the #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Designation of Local Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/9/2020) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 8 Summons issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons for the defendant and deliver the summons and copies of the complaint and the notice of right to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge to the United States Marshal. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/9/2020) (ndt)
|
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (hml) |
| Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Carolyn Ann Stephens re #4 MOTION to Waive Local Counsel (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Waive Local Counsel filed by Carolyn Ann Stephens (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Carolyn Ann Stephens. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Carolyn Ann Stephens (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Carolyn Ann Stephens. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
