Neal v. USA
Defendant: M K Lewis
Petitioner: Saint Florel Neal
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2020cv01014
Filed: April 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Jun 11 08:20:18 CDT 2020 (crt)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ for USA added. Deadline to reply to the answer is 20 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/10/2020) (svc)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: the petitioner's #7 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is therefore DEEMED MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/10/2020) (mcrd)
June 10, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Jun 10 11:39:46 CDT 2020 (crt)
June 8, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Saint Florel Neal. (oyh)
June 8, 2020 Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Saint Florel Neal. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge.(oyh) Modified event text on 6/9/2020 (axm).
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Saint Florel Neal must address the following deficiency: Your claims had not been submitted on the appropriate form for that type of action. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/26/2020) (Attachments: #1 2241 Form) (mla)
May 26, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue May 26 14:35:22 CDT 2020 (crt)
April 23, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,4. Thu Apr 23 13:37:14 CDT 2020 (crt)
April 22, 2020 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm)
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Defendant's motion seeking good-time credit is liberally construed as a request for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Clerk is DIRECTED to open for statistical purposes a new habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. 2241 based on Defendant's motion. All further filings related to the 2241 habeas petition should be submitted in the newly opened case. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to send Defendant the appropriate 2241 form and prisoner motion to proceed in forma pauperis. He has 30 days from the date of this order within which to complete the forms and return them. (Originally filed as document #230 in case 3:04-CR-46-M) (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 4/22/2020) (Attachments: #1 2241 Form, #2 IFP Form) (axm)
April 22, 2020 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm)
January 31, 2020 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Saint Florel Neal. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed as document #229 in case 3:04-CR-46-M) (axm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neal v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Saint Florel Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M K Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?