C & K Trucking LLC et al v. Ardent Mills LLC
| 3:2020cv01104 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Before the Court are Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Ardent Mills, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Defendant's Motion") (Doc. No. 52), Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Mot ion for Summary Judgment ("Plaintiff's Response") (Doc. No. 56), and Reply Brief in Support of Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Ardent Mills, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Defendant's Reply") (Doc. No. 6 2). After carefully considering Defendant's Motion, Plaintiff's Response, Defendants Reply, the associated briefs and appendices, and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion. Also before the Co urt are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant's Counterclaim ("Plaintiff's Motion") (Doc. No. 49), Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Ardent Mills, LLC's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Defendant's Response") Doc. No. 54), and Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant's Counterclaim ("Plaintiff's Reply") (Doc. No. 61). Because the Court grants summary judgment as to Plaintiff's liability on Defendant's breach of contract counterclaim, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. (chmb)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Before the Court are Defendant Ardent Mills LLC's Motion to Dismiss Promissory Estoppel Claim in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32) and Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion to Dismiss P romissory Estoppel Claim in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 33) (collectively, the "Motion"). After careful consideration of the Motion, response, reply, relevant portions of the record, and applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion and DISMISSES the promissory estoppel claim. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/9/2021) (chmb)
|
|
Filing
30
Memorandum Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. However, the Court also GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend its Complaint as previously explained. Should Plaintiff fail to file its amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff's claims for promissory estoppel and tortious interference with existing and prospective business relations will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/20/2021) (chmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: C & K Trucking LLC et al v. Ardent Mills LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
