Donnelly et al v. Academic Partnerships LLC
| 3:2020cv01106 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS 77 AP's motion for summary judgment, GRANTS IN PART AND FINDS AS MOOT IN PART AP's 93 motion to strike, and DENIES Donnelly and Johnson's 103 motion for sanctions. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 6/14/2023) (sxf)
|
|
Filing
59
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff Dante Williams' Claims and Brief in Support and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Williams's claims. By separate order, the Court will issue a final judgment as to Williams. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/8/2022) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
21
Memorandum Opinion and Order GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 7 Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Academic Partnerships LLC. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/9/2021) (ndt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Donnelly et al v. Academic Partnerships LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
