Nam v. Tex Net Inc et al
| Hee Sook Nam |
| Gene Surh, Thomas Ryu, Dae Surh, Tex Tech Investment LLC, Theresa Surh and Tex Net Inc |
| 3:2020cv01132 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 REPLY filed by Hee Sook Nam re: #7 First MOTION to Remand (Chu, William) |
Filing 22
ELECTRONIC ORDER: At the FRCP 16 Scheduling Conference, held on July 1, 2020, Plaintiff orally moved for leave to amend her Complaint, and the Court granted the Motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file an amended Complaint by July 31, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 7/1/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 21 ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Karen Gren Scholer: Scheduling Teleconference held on 7/1/2020. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - William Chu; Defense - Gregory Sudbury. (Court Reporter: Tutti Bui) (No exhibits) Time in Court - :14. (TUB) |
|
Filing 20
ELECTRONIC ORDER: *TIME CHANGE ONLY* The Court reschedules the FRCP 16 Scheduling Conference to July 1, 2020, at 03:00 p.m. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/30/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 19 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order (Agreed) by Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc. (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 18 REPLY filed by Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Sudbury, Gregory) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: FRCP 16 Scheduling Conference set for via teleconference on 7/1/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Karen Gren Scholer. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/23/2020) (axm)
|
| Filing 16 Appendix in Support filed by Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re #15 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #14 Response/Objection to Motion to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re #14 Response/Objection to Motion to Remand (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re: #7 First MOTION to Remand (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 13 Appendix in Support filed by Hee Sook Nam re #12 Response/Objection (Chu, William) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Hee Sook Nam re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Chu, William) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff shall file her response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by 6/11/2020. Defendants Tex Net, Inc., Theresa Surh, Gene Surh, and Thomas Ryu shall file their response to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand by 6/17/2020. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/5/2020) (aaa)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #7 First MOTION to Remand , #5 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Hee Sook Nam with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chu, William) |
| Filing 9 Agreed STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL of Defendant Thomas Ryu Without Prejudice by Thomas Ryu. (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 Appendix in Support filed by Hee Sook Nam re #7 First MOTION to Remand (Chu, William) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand filed by Hee Sook Nam with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chu, William) |
| Filing 6 Appendix in Support filed by Thomas Ryu, Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #5 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3) (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Thomas Ryu, Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Thomas Ryu, Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Tex Net Inc (Sudbury, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas Ryu, Gene Surh, Theresa Surh, Texnet, Inc.. (Carlson, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-20-05724 filed by Texnet, Inc., Theresa Surh, Gene Surh, Thomas Ryu. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10817849) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A through A-7, #2 Exhibit(s) A-8 through A-13, #3 Exhibit(s) B - Notice of Related Case, #4 Exhibit(s) C - Declaration of Gene Surh, #5 Cover Sheet, #6 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Sudbury, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
