Atlantic Downtown Dallas Venture LLC v. Schindler Elevator Corporation
Plaintiff: Atlantic Downtown Dallas Venture LLC and Atlantic Hotel Construction Inc
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Case Number: 3:2020cv01318
Filed: May 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Court GRANTS Schindler's most recently filed #7 motion to remand. The Court further DISMISSES AS MOOT Schindler's earlier filed #6 motion to remand. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 6/18/2020) (mla)
June 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On June 8, 2020, defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation filed a motion to remand this case back to state court [Doc. No. 7]. If plaintiffs Atlantic Downtown Dallas Venture LLC or Atlantic Hotel Construction Inc. wish to respond to this motion, they must do so within 5 days of the issuance of this order. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 6/12/2020) (chmb)
June 8, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aubert, Christopher)
June 4, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aubert, Christopher) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/8/2020 to flatten pdf) (axm).
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation's Motion to Extend Time to File Notice. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/29/2020) (chmb)
May 29, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time to file notice filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aubert, Christopher)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Court ORDERS Schindler to file a notice addressing the open question of this Court's diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). The notice is due within 3 days of the issuance of this order. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/26/2020) (axm)
May 20, 2020 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh)
May 20, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 162nd District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-19-15560 filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10852442) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A-Index of Documents, #4 Exhibit(s) B-Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) C-Filings, #6 Exhibit(s) C01-Petition, #7 Exhibit(s) C02-Service Request, #8 Exhibit(s) C03-Citation-Shahzay, #9 Exhibit(s) C04-Citation-Schindler, #10 Exhibit(s) C05-Return-Schindler, #11 Exhibit(s) C06-Return-Shahzay, #12 Exhibit(s) C07-Answer-Schindler, #13 Exhibit(s) C08-Clerk Ltr-Aubert, #14 Exhibit(s) C09-Clerk Ltr-Rosenberg, #15 Exhibit(s) C10-Scheduling Order, #16 Exhibit(s) C11-Mot for Default, #17 Exhibit(s) C12-Prop Judgment, #18 Exhibit(s) C13-Partial Judgment, #19 Exhibit(s) C14-Letter, #20 Exhibit(s) D-Cert of Int Persons) (Aubert, Christopher)
May 20, 2020 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (See Document #1 for Image) (oyh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlantic Downtown Dallas Venture LLC v. Schindler Elevator Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlantic Downtown Dallas Venture LLC
Represented By: Jay M Rosenberg
Represented By: Phillip J Conley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlantic Hotel Construction Inc
Represented By: Jay M Rosenberg
Represented By: Phillip J Conley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Represented By: Christopher J Aubert
Represented By: David M Gold
Represented By: Brenton P Monteleone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?