Jones v. Lewis et al
| Kevin Jerome Jones |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, NFN Curry, B Lewis, B Johnson and K Hulto |
| 3:2020cv01345 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Kevin Jerome Jones. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NFN Curry, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, K Hulto, B Johnson, B Lewis filed by Kevin Jerome Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (jmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
