Sjem et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
| Susan Sjem and William Sjem |
| DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Dr. Russell Tigges, Dr. Stewart Kaufman and Orthopedic Associates of Dutchess County PC |
| Special Master |
| 3:2020cv01532 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Case electronically transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 7:11-cv-08925. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - Northern District of Texas. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/10/2020) (sjo) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 9 MDL REMAND IN: Received certified copy of docket entries and documents numbered 9-35 from the United States District Court - Northern District of Ohio. Case Number: 1:11-dp-23159 (JJH), MDL Number: 2197, (Attachments: #1 Affidavit #9-Appearance, #2 Affidavit #10-Appearance, #3 Affidavit #11-Verified Answer, #4 Affidavit #12-Verified Answer, #5 Affidavit #13-Crossclaim, #6 Affidavit #14-Crossclaim, #7 Affidavit #15-Answer, #8 Affidavit #16-Answer, #9 Affidavit #17-Answer, #10 Affidavit #18-Answer, #11 Affidavit #19-Motion, #12 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 1, #13 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 2, #14 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 3, #15 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 4, #16 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 5, #17 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 6, #18 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 7, #19 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 8, #20 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 9, #21 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 10, #22 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 11, #23 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 12, #24 Exhibit #19-Exhibit 13, #25 Affidavit #20-Response, #26 Affidavit #21-Motion, #27 Exhibit #21-Exhibit 1, #28 Exhibit #21-Exhibit 2, #29 Affidavit #22-Letter, #30 Affidavit #23-Order, #31 Affidavit #24-Amended Order, #32 Affidavit #25-Response, #33 Exhibit #25-Exhibit 1, #34 Affidavit #26-Letter, #35 Affidavit #27-Joint Stipulation, #36 Exhibit #27-Exhibit 1, #37 Affidavit #28-Order, #38 Affidavit #29-Notice of Service, #39 Exhibit #29-Exhibit 1, #40 Affidavit #30-Motion, #41 Exhibit #30-Exhibit 1, #42 Affidavit #31-Motion, #43 Affidavit #32-Amende Complaint, #44 Affidavit #33-Motion, #45 Exhibit #33-Exhibit 1, #46 Exhibit #33-Exhibit 2, #47 Exhibit #33-Exhibit 3, #48 Affidavit #34-Suggestion of Remand, #49 Affidavit #35-Conditional Remand Order) (sjo) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL REMAND IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...Pursuant to the order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation dated 5/29/2020, the cases listed in the appendix to this order are hereby remanded to the Transferor Courts (S.D.N.Y.) shown in the appendix subject to the following terms and conditions. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/29/2020) (sjo) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - Northern District of Texas (sjo) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Northern District of Ohio acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:11-dp-23159, filed on 12/28/2011. (tro) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - Northern District of Ohio. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/22/2011) (rj) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - Northern District of Ohio (rj) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Dupuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Winter, John) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURTCONFERENCE: A conference will be held before the Hon. Cathy Seibel, U.S.D.J. on January 6, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 218. This case has been designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York. The parties should refer to ECF Doc. No.3, submit the Report under I.A. within seven days before the conference, and be prepared at the conference to discuss the issues set forth in 1.B. Status Conference set for 1/6/2012 at 12:30 PM in Courtroom 218, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. (lnl) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal served on Plaintiffs' Counsel on December 7, 2011. Document filed by Dupuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Winter, John) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (lnl) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.]
|
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson International for Dupuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Document filed by Dupuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (lnl) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/13/2011) (lnl). [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme, County of Dutchess. Case Number: 6245/11. (Filing Fee $350.00, Receipt Number 465401023730). Document filed by Stewart Kaufman, Orthopedic Associates of Dutchess County P.C., Dupuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Russell Tigges. (lnl) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (lnl) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
| Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis is so designated. (lnl) [Transferred from New York Southern on 6/11/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
