Boland v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
| Rosalinda Samano Boland |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Corporation doing business as Costco Wholesale also known as Costco Wholesale Membership Inc also known as Trop-Exotica Wholesale Imports Inc, Trop-Exotica Wholesale Imports Inc and Costco Wholesale Membership Inc |
| ADR Provider |
| 3:2020cv01567 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Defendant's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation (Cox, John)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Defendant's Discovery Requests to Plaintiff filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation (Cox, John)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Agreement by the parties filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation (Cox, John)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Trial set for three-week docket beginning 10/5/2021 before Judge Ada Brown. Joinder of Parties due by 1/11/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 1/11/2021. Motions due by 6/17/2021. Discovery due by 7/30/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 4/12/2021. The court appoints Dana McArthur as mediator. Settlement Status Report due by 4/19/2021. Pretrial Order due by 9/10/2021. Pretrial Materials due by 9/10/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 10/4/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Ada Brown. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 7/6/2020) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 4
Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Cox, John)
|
|
Filing 3
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, lead counsel are directed to meet and confer for the purpose of submitting a Joint Status Report as follows. (Joint Status Report Due Three (3) Weeks from the Date of this Order) (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 6/15/2020) (twd)
|
|
Filing 2
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml)
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (See Document #1 for image) by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (hml)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10912440) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B-1, #3 Exhibit(s) B-2, #4 Exhibit(s) B-3, #5 Exhibit(s) B-4, #6 Exhibit(s) C, #7 Exhibit(s) C-1, #8 Exhibit(s) C-2, #9 Exhibit(s) C-3, #10 Exhibit(s) C-4, #11 Cover Sheet, #12 Cover Sheet Supplement, #13 Additional Page(s) Certificate of Interested Persons) (Cox, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
