Saenz v. Calix-Barahona
| Javier Saenz |
| Elvin Calix-Barahona |
| 3:2020cv01641 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Defendant's response to the complaint is due October 16, 2020. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/17/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Elvin Calix-Barahona (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Mediation Confirmation, #2 Proposed Order) (Davis, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Jacob Davis on behalf of Elvin Calix-Barahona. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Davis, Robert) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Elvin Calix-Barahona. Waiver sent on 7/1/2020. (Roberts, James) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Elvin Calix-Barahona. (hml) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Javier Saenz. (Palmer, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Elvin Calix-Barahona filed by Javier Saenz. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10932047) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (Palmer, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saenz v. Calix-Barahona | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Elvin Calix-Barahona | |
| Represented By: | Robert Jacob Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Javier Saenz | |
| Represented By: | Scott H Palmer |
| Represented By: | James Roberts |
| Represented By: | Niles S Illich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
