Fonteno et al v. Autoflex Leasing Dallas I LLC et al
Alicia Fonteno and Jeremy Fonteno |
General Motors Financial Company Inc, Autoflex Leasing Dallas I LLC, General Motors Financial Company Inc doing business as GM Financial and Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC doing business as Autoflex Leasing |
3:2020cv01695 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1640 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to hold the conference required by Rule 26(f) within 14 days of the date of this Order and report to the Court as required by that Rule. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/14/2020) (ctf) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint filed by General Motors Financial Company Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Hogan, Melinda) |
Filing 13 Brief in Support of #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC (Williams, Benton) Terminated motion and modified text to match document on 8/14/2020 (dsr). |
Filing 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Williams, Benton) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC's response is due 8/17/2020. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/16/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. General Motors Financial Company Inc's response is due 8/17/2020. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/16/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, Benton) |
Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by General Motors Financial Company Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stevens, Gregg) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. General Motors Financial Company Inc's response to the complaint is due July 16, 2020. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/1/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by General Motors Financial Company Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hogan, Melinda) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC response due 7/16/2020. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 6/30/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Autoflex Leasing-Dallas I LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Williams, Benton) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/29/2020) (ykp). |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Autoflex Leasing Dallas I LLC. (Williams, Benton) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Autoflex Leasing Dallas I LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10947709) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A (Index of All Documents Filed in State Court Action), #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-1 (Docket Sheet of State Court Action), #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-2 (Plaintiffs' Original Complaint Filed in State Court Action), #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-3 (Letter Request for Issuance of Citations), #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-4 (Citation Issued for Defendant Autoflex), #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-5 (Citation Issued for Defendant GM Financial), #7 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-6 (State Court Notice to Plaintiffs Counsel of Dismissal Hearing), #8 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-7 (Proof of Service for Defendant GM Financial), #9 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-8 (Proof of Service of Defendant Autoflex), #10 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B (Co-Defendant GM Financial's Written Consent for Removal to Federal Court), #11 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C (Civil Cover Sheet), #12 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D (Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)) (Williams, Benton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.