Clowe et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
| 3:2020cv01702 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 152 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 161 Defendants' Motion to Strike The Case-Specific Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Vladamir Iakovlev for Failure to Com ply with PTO 121; denying without prejudice 155 Defendants' Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Dr. Daniel Elliott; denying without prejudice 158 Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Case-Specific Opinions of Vladimir Iakovlev, MD; denyi ng without prejudice 164 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude the General Causation Opinions of Defense Expert Christina Pramudji, M.D. The court directs the parties to inform it no later than 4/1/2022, whether they can resolve this action without further court involvement. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/16/2022) (jmg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clowe et al v. Ethicon Inc et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
