MacArthur Dental PA v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
MacArthur Dental PA |
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company |
3:2020cv02102 |
August 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures filed by MacArthur Dental PA (McGinnis, Patrick) Modified docket text on 9/17/2020 (oyh). |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MacArthur Dental PA. (McGinnis, Patrick) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Trial set for one week docket beginning 4/26/2021 before Judge David C Godbey. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/28/2020) (mjr) |
Filing 4 Joint STATUS REPORT and Rule 26(F) Report filed by Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company. (Schreiber, Chad) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/7/2020) (axm) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11059485) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Index of Matters Being Filed, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 Exhibit(s) B, #5 Exhibit(s) C, #6 Exhibit(s) D, #7 Exhibit(s) E, #8 Exhibit(s) F) (Schreiber, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MacArthur Dental PA v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MacArthur Dental PA | |
Represented By: | Chad Troy Wilson |
Represented By: | Patrick Connell McGinnis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Mark C Dodart |
Represented By: | Chad William Schreiber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.