McCall v. Flagship Credit Acceptance
| Shani Adia McCall |
| Flagship Credit Acceptance |
| 3:2020cv02744 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Other Statutes: Freedom of Information Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to the provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915, permission is hereby granted for the above named plaintiff(s) to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court until judgment is entered herein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. A true copy of this order shall be mailed to each plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney of record. No further process shall issue except upon further order of the Court. After docketing, this action shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford for further proceedings and/or findings and recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/7/2020) (ctf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Oct 7 11:28:49 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 3. Wed Sep 2 10:20:53 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Default Judgment against Flagship Credit Acceptance filed by Shani Adia McCall. (oyh) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shani Adia McCall. (oyh) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Flagship Credit Acceptance filed by Shani Adia McCall. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) Modified on 9/2/2020 (oyh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCall v. Flagship Credit Acceptance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shani Adia McCall | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Flagship Credit Acceptance | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
