McCoy et al v. Valvoline LLC
Plaintiff: Tommy McCoy and Tommy McCoy Inc
Defendant: Valvoline, LLC and Valvoline LLC
Case Number: 3:2020cv03062
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: The plaintiffs have failed timely to request a jury trial under Rule 81(c) after removal of this action from state court. When a jury demand is untimely or improperly made, the court may, on motion, "order a jury trial on any issue for which a jury might have been demanded." FED. R. CIV. P. 39(b). The court construes the plaintiffs' jury demand as a #12 motion for jury trial and sets the following briefing schedule: The defendant shall file its response no later than 12/15/2020. The plaintiffs shall file their reply no later than 12/29/2020. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/24/2020) (twd)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE AND CERTAIN PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS: Amended Pleadings due by 2/1/2021. Discovery due by 8/1/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 2/1/2021. Motions due by 6/1/2021. Pretrial Materials due by 10/22/2021. Pretrial Order due by 10/22/2021. Status Report due by 4/23/2021. This case is set for trial on this court's four-week docket beginning 11/1/2021 before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. Pretrial Conference set for 10/29/2021 10:30 AM before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/23/2020) (ndt)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Jury Trial (Per #14 Order by Tommy McCoy. (Cole, Robert) Docket text modified on 11/24/2020 (twd).
November 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Tommy McCoy. (Cole, Robert)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 11/25/2020. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/5/2020) (axm)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The plaintiffs' unopposed and verified motion to reopen terminated lawsuit (docket entry #7 ) is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that this case is REOPENED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/5/2020) (chmb)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tommy McCoy, Tommy McCoy Inc . (Cole, Robert) Modified event on 11/5/2020 (mjr).
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Tommy McCoy with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Cole, Robert)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 6, 2020, the plaintiffs were ordered to file a certificate of interested persons within 21 days (docket entry 3), but they have failed to do so. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Rule 16(f)(1)(c). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/30/2020) (chmb)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Civil Case Terminated. (chmb)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Valvoline LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Valvoline US LLC for Valvoline LLC. (Hawpe, Jeremy) Modified corporate parent on 10/9/2020 (mla).
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 6, 2020, the defendant removed this civil action to this court. Local Rule 81.2 provides that "[w]ithin 21 days after the notice of removal is filed, the plaintiff shall file a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e). If the plaintiff concurs in the accuracy of another party's previously-filed certificate, the plaintiff may adopt that certificate." LR 3.1(c) and 3.2(e) in turn require that "[w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with... a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than 21 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/6/2020) (chmb)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 6, 2020, the defendant removed this civil action to this court. Local Rule 81.1(a) now provides that "[t]he party or parties who remove a civil action from state court must provide the following to the clerk for filing:... (4)(D) a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e)." LR 3.1(c) and 3.2(e) in turn require that "[w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with...a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than 21 days after this order is filed, the defendant must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/6/2020) (chmb)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Valvoline, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11240573) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Appendix ISO Notice of Removal) (Hawpe, Jeremy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy et al v. Valvoline LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valvoline, LLC
Represented By: Jeremy Wayne Hawpe
Represented By: Ross Garrick Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valvoline LLC
Represented By: Jeremy Wayne Hawpe
Represented By: Ross Garrick Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tommy McCoy
Represented By: Robert Randolph Cole, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tommy McCoy Inc
Represented By: Robert Randolph Cole, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?