Moton v. Gordy
Petitioner: Mark Anthony Moton
Respondent: Warden Bryan Gordy
Case Number: 3:2020cv03173
Filed: October 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 12/9/2020) (twd)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Any objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the #9 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 12/9/2020) (twd)
December 9, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12, 13. Wed Dec 9 16:26:14 CST 2020 (crt)
November 3, 2020 Filing 11 OBJECTION to #9 Findings and Recommendations. (hml)
November 2, 2020 Filing 10 Copy Request by Mark Anthony Moton with Deputy Clerk Response. (cdt)
October 22, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Oct 22 10:14:29 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Moton's #1 petition should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2020) (ndt) Modified filed date on 10/23/2020 (mla).
October 20, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. NEF of Case Transferred to Dallas Tue Oct 20 18:06:32 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 19, 2020 Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm)
October 19, 2020 Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER: It is ORDERED that the petition be TRANSFERRED to the Dallas Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/19/2020) (bdb)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to the provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915, Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/19/2020) (bdb)
October 19, 2020 New case number 3:20-cv-3173-S; Moton v. Gordy has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 4:20-cv-1141-O. Future filings should be made in the DALLAS division and reflect the new case number as indicated. Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (cea)
October 19, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Mon Oct 19 13:29:57 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 16, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Fri Oct 16 09:17:10 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (pef)
October 15, 2020 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef)
October 15, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Mark Anthony Moton. (pef)
October 15, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mark Anthony Moton. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (pef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moton v. Gordy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Anthony Moton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Bryan Gordy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?