Neupane v. Barr et al
| Biraj Neupane |
| William Palham Barr, Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Chad Wolf and Marc Moore |
| 3:2020cv03199 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Mail returned as undeliverable. #10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #11 Order, Terminate Motions Set/Reset Answer Deadline, received back from Biraj Neupane as Return to Sender Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (ndt) |
Filing 14
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court should dismiss this action as moot. The undersigned DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation on Neupane at the home address that the government provides for him. See Dkt. No. 13 at 6. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/7/2020) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. mailed to address 3408 Bandera Ranch RD Roanoke, TX 76262 Mon Dec 7 17:02:57 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Palham Barr. (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) Modified text/event/linkage on 12/7/2020 (mjr). |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chad Wolf. (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES IN A 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2241 HABEAS ACTION AND WITHDRAWING #6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: Because Neupane has paid the filing fee, the undersigned WITHDRAWS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation as to Neupane's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. No. 6]. Answer due from William Palham Barr, Marc Moore, Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Chad Wolf on 2/1/2021. Petitioner may submit a reply brief to the Response within 30 days from the date of service of the Response. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/1/2020) (ykp)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Dec 1 16:35:23 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 11/30/2020) (svc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Nov 30 15:08:42 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING CONSTRUED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PETITION: Neupane has now filed a #8 Motion to Effect Changes Immediately, notifying the Court of a factual error in his habeas petition and requesting that it be corrected. The Court, construing this motion as seeking leave to amend his petition, GRANTS Neupane leave to amend. And this filing shall be part of and thereby corrects the factual error within the habeas petition Neupane filed previously. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 11/6/2020) (ykp) Modified on 11/13/2020 (mcrd).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Fri Nov 6 10:50:34 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Effect Changes filed by Biraj Neupane. (hml) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #5 MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/28/2020) (jmg)
|
|
Filing 6
***WITHDRAWN PER ORDER AT DOCKET #11 *** FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion. The Court should deny Petitioner Biraj Neupane leave to proceed in forma pauperis, see Dkt. No. #4 , and order that he pay the $5.00 filing fee within 21 days of any order accepting or adopting this recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/28/2020) (jmg) Modified on 12/2/2020 (cea).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Oct 28 14:13:40 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Oct 28 14:16:54 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Oct 21 12:14:01 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Biraj Neupane. (jmg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Biraj Neupane. (jmg) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Biraj Neupane. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
