MedARC LLC v. Scott & White Health Plan
Revolution Neuromonitoring LLC, Revolution Monitoring Management LLC and MedARC LLC |
Scott & White Health Plan and Scott and White Health Plan |
Harlin D Hale and Case Admin Sup |
3:2020cv03241 |
October 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Sam A Lindsay |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by MedARC LLC re: #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Albert, Craig) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Scott and White Health Plan. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Herman, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 *** DISREGARD DUPLICATE ENTRY OF DOC #8 *** Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scott and White Health Plan with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Herman, Jonathan) Modified on 12/1/2020 (mjr). |
Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scott and White Health Plan with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Herman, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF TRANSFER: Under authority of 28 U.S.C. sec. 157(a), this case is referred to United States Bankruptcy Judge Harlin D. Hale for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/30/2020) (mjr) |
Filing 6 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Scott and White Health Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Herman, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Case reassigned to Judge David C Godbey for all further proceedings. Judge Sam A. Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 10/26/2020) (svc) |
Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Scott & White Health Plan. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet (Amended)) (Herman, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Scott & White Health Plan. (Herman, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Scott & White Health Plan. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11297859) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit A - Index, #4 Plaintiff's Original Petition, #5 Executed Citation, #6 State Docket Sheet) (Herman, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.