Sala v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Larry Sala
Defendant: Edward Barnard, Scottsdale Insurance Company and Michael Grantland
Case Number: 3:2020cv03330
Filed: November 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER: It appears to the court that more than 90 days have elapsed since the filing of the plaintiff's petition and that service on the defendant Michael Grantland ("Grantland") in this case has not yet been accomplished. Unless the plaintiff shows cause in writing by January 8, 2021, why his claims against Grantland should be retained on the docket, they will be dismissed without further notice. Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/29/2020) (chmb)
December 21, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brennan Michael Kucera for Benjamin Tenenholtz on behalf of Larry Sala. (Kucera, Brennan)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, the plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/2/2020) (chmb)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The court construes the plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend time and retain on docket (docket entry #6 ) as unopposed motions to reopen the case and to extend time to file a certificate of interested parties. The motion to reopen the case is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that this case is REOPENED. The plaintiff's certificate of interested parties (docket entry 6-1) is deemed filed. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion to extend time is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/2/2020) (chmb)
December 2, 2020 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time To File Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Larry Sala. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Kucera, Brennan)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On November 9, 2020, the plaintiff was ordered to file a certificate of interested persons satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) within twenty days (docket entry 4) but has failed to do so. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Rule 16(f)(1)(C), F.R. Civ. P. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/2/2020) (chmb)
December 2, 2020 Civil Case Terminated. (chmb)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The plaintiff has yet to provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. N.D. TEX. CIV. R. 3.1(c) and 3.2(e) requires that "[w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with... a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/9/2020) (chmb)
November 6, 2020 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml)
November 6, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Edward Barnard, Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Arnold, George)
November 6, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11335467) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7, #8 Cover Sheet, #9 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Arnold, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sala v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Barnard
Represented By: George Howard Arnold
Represented By: Susan Sparks Usery
Represented By: Rhonda J Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Represented By: George Howard Arnold
Represented By: Susan Sparks Usery
Represented By: Rhonda J Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Grantland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Sala
Represented By: Brennan Michael Kucera
Represented By: Benjamin Crowell
Represented By: Benjamin Micah Tenenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?